http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog A Weblog for Informal Discussion of Articles from the LYCEUM Sun, 17 Jun 2012 04:25:59 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog/?p=84&cpage=1#comment-53131 Saffron Sun, 17 Jun 2012 04:25:59 +0000 http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog/?p=84#comment-53131 Great web site. A lot of useful information here. I'm sending it to some pals ans additionally sharing in delicious. And naturally, thanks to your sweat! Great web site. A lot of useful information here. I’m sending it to some pals ans additionally sharing in delicious. And naturally, thanks to your sweat!

]]> http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog/?p=84&cpage=1#comment-49550 Dwight Breon Sat, 05 May 2012 09:29:49 +0000 http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog/?p=84#comment-49550 The website is up and rocking. Thanks. The website is up and rocking.
Thanks.

]]> http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog/?p=76&cpage=1#comment-41489 sharon Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:48:58 +0000 http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog/?p=76#comment-41489 glad to see your doing good :) glad to see your doing good

]]> http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog/?p=13&cpage=1#comment-26571 Mike Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:12:16 +0000 http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog/?p=13#comment-26571 I'd simply like to add that this has seemed to have been the trend in science in recent years. They try to shroud themselves in enigmatic obscurity to make science seem more inaccessible. In my opinion, it's more of a cry for help, because they're finding themselves against a brick wall, before which their most coveted beliefs are being exposed. I’d simply like to add that this has seemed to have been the trend in science in recent years. They try to shroud themselves in enigmatic obscurity to make science seem more inaccessible. In my opinion, it’s more of a cry for help, because they’re finding themselves against a brick wall, before which their most coveted beliefs are being exposed.

]]> http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog/?p=13&cpage=1#comment-26570 Mike Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:03:09 +0000 http://www.lyceumphilosophy.com/blog/?p=13#comment-26570 The link to the article wasn't any good, so I'll continue without making any reference to it. Non-Euclidean geometry always redefines common-sense propositions, therefore there is no conflict. "Curved-space" geometry from its inception negates the possibility of what could be called a straight line. A priori judgements remain intact, and any judgement from NE geometry, as useful as they may be, must be interpreted appropriately as narrowly constrained by dictated rules. For example: The shortest distance between two lines is a curve, must be understood to mean: You take the curved road, not because it's the shortest distance as you might think, but because straight lines are forbidden in this particular geometry. The link to the article wasn’t any good, so I’ll continue without making any reference to it. Non-Euclidean geometry always redefines common-sense propositions, therefore there is no conflict. “Curved-space” geometry from its inception negates the possibility of what could be called a straight line. A priori judgements remain intact, and any judgement from NE geometry, as useful as they may be, must be interpreted appropriately as narrowly constrained by dictated rules. For example: The shortest distance between two lines is a curve, must be understood to mean: You take the curved road, not because it’s the shortest distance as you might think, but because straight lines are forbidden in this particular geometry.

]]>